Search results for: "At" (3343 results)
profit-motivated government confiscations. It argues that these “contemporary civil forfeitures” are not forfeitures at all—they are compensable
adversarialism. This Note assesses the limited participation of outside amici curiae at the court and proposes a special advocate to serve as a permanent
the constitutionality of these profit-motivated government confiscations. It argues that these “contemporary civil forfeitures” are not forfeitures at
motivated government confiscations. It argues that these “contemporary civil forfeitures” are not forfeitures at all—they are compensable takings
these agreements integrate Church doctrine into state legal systems at the expense of LGBTQ rights. This Note unearths this vast treaty regime—and
Smith is a partner at Jenner & Block in Washington, D.C. He argued argued petitioners case in Lawrence v. Texas in the Supreme Court, and served as
life after a listless first half—earning him unfettered praise from Joshua Geltzer (Editor-in-Chief, 11), who dubbed him a true leader at every step. Led
civil forfeitures” are not forfeitures at all—they are compensable takings. After several decades, the Supreme Court has revised its interpretation of
is Professor of Law at Boston College Law School. She is the author of The Transatlantic Constitution: Colonial Legal Culture and the Empire (2004
looks at direct and indirect obstacles faced by college students seeking to vote on campus. It explores and proposes legal avenues and advocacy efforts