Search results for: "IF" (3763 results)
nation was affiliated--if actions taken by that foreign n… Comment 115 Yale L.J. 727 (2005) In Henderson v. Stalder, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth
gives the states an escape hatch. If a state declines to establish a state-based exchange, it is deemed “not an electing State” and the statute directs
revocation regimes when considering limitations on their power to disenroll. If tribes choose to address disenrollment by embracing international norms
positive-law text by searching for clarity in both: Even if there is a conflict between the original Congressional enactment contained in the Statutes at
specifically addressed the question at issue. If so, that is the end of the matter. If not, then the court must ask whether or not the agency’s
exchanges “state-based exchanges.” But the Act also gives the states an escape hatch. If a state declines to establish a state-based exchange, it is
Rico.6 Second, a bill that enfranchises Puerto Ricans in elections for the House might pass constitutional muster even if H.R. 1433 does not, because
and guarantees of non-recurrence argues that “reparations will only be successful if victims and civil society at large have been involved in the design
existed; if any cameras were recording, the prison’s policy was to delete footage after thirty days. The documents Berry received were mostly
implicit—if still somewhat fuzzy—limiting principles regarding the types of reliance claims made by regulatory beneficiaries that agencies must