Search results for: "2" (3471 results)
occurs. This Feature (1) argues that, sometimes, presence in such spaces is the message and (2) proposes a First Amendment defense ground… Feature This
Allowing parties to unilaterally strike prospective jurors without explanation has been attacked as undemocratic,1 as prone to manipulation,2 as a
“for the purpose of representation on all matters of employer-employee relations”); 5 Ill. Comp. Stat. 315/2 (2012) (stating that public employees
part and dissenting in part). Id. at 1932 (Alito, J., concurring in part) (first citing 5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(2); and then citing Heckler v. Chaney, 470
2023 WL 5420648, at 2 (S.C. Aug. 23, 2023) (noting the retirement of Justice Hearn). Id. (asserting that the state shall not “penalize, prosecute, or
determination, see, for example, Margaret Moore, The Ethics of Nationalism (2001); David Miller, On Nationality, 2 Nations & Nationalism 409 (1996); Christopher
could (1) allow defendants to make a federal anti-SLAPP motion while (2) conditioning that motion on a showing that the plaintiff’s purpose was to
Allocation of CPU Resources, U.S. Patent No. 5,333,319 (filed Mar. 2, 1992) (issued July 26, 1994), available at http://www.google.com/patents/US5333319.pdf
Process for Sale 2 (May 26, 2020) (unpublished manuscript) (on file with author) (discussing the control of the lenders in the Neiman Marcus and J
Marshall’s broad and capacious nationalist vision”). See William J. Novak, The People’s Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America 1-2