Search results for: "A" (4254 results)
Introduction In their recent article in The Yale Law Journal, Professors Richard R.W. Brooks and Alexander Stremitzer make the case for a liberal allowance of
were historically executed as statutory mergers, recent Delaware case law facilitates a new mechanism--freezeout via tender offer--by eliminating entire
compromise. In particular, when Congress enacts a clear and precise statutory text--one that articulates not only a set of relevant aims but also the
answer is yes, and that the Texas legislature has singled out abortion for burdensome and unwarranted health restrictions that obstruct a woman’s
’ fairness and legitimacy. This Essay argues that courts must prioritize procedural justice by adopting judging practices that consider unrepresented litigants’ circumstances and ...
A second vision is offered by scholars of cooperative federalism, who argue... 115 Yale L.J. 1408 (2006) This Note argues that Title VII doctrine
jurisdiction. Both arbitration and tribal courts are favored by acts... Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, a dispute over a controversial off
Jules L. Coleman | Yale Law Journal Jules L. Coleman In a recent article appearing in The Yale Law Journal, Ariel Porat argues that the tort of
of the historical arguments employed by judges in contemporary Second Amendment jurisprudence. The authors argue that this jurisprudence mistakes a
abortion clinics. All agreed that the governing standard was the undue burden framework the Court had adopted a... 120 Yale L.J. 2028 (2011). Today, many