Search results for: "A" (4254 results)
precedents as judicial avoidance. But one of the cases she cites as a foil—Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau—is a curious fit. The removal cases are tough to ...
practically flawed. When a search implicates multiple states’ laws, courts should undertake a two-step analysis. First, they should determine whether a
principle of abuse of property right. Owners abuse their right, I argue, when their decisions about a thing are designed just to produce harm. This is so
mechanisms have largely escaped judicial and scholarly scrutiny. This Comment urges courts to assess the constitutionality of a states ballot access scheme
of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), is said to tell a gripping detective story, a story of right and wrong and moral courage. The unlikely
an important book, Active Liberty, which crystallizes a fundamental set of beliefs about the American Constitution and his role as a Justice. Taking
appointed attorneys from abandoning their clients after trial. The Court provided that if counsel wishes to withdraw from a “frivolous” case, he or she
from a U.S. court? Increasingly, and troublingly, the answer is yes. In In re Soto Vega, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denied a gay mans
wartime? For Ely, the answer was a new and improved version of the War Powers Resolution, a solution entirely...
same price by every firm in a market—should be considered a violation of antitrust law. But there has been a comparative neglect of the importance of