Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 777, 782-83 (2000). 38. 2 BLACKSTONE, supra note 14, at *405-06. 39. To be sure, Blackstone’s discussion draws a distinction
Speech, 48 UCLA L. Rev. 1 (2000); Post, Participatory Democracy and Free Speech, supra note 10; Robert Post, Participatory Democracy as a Theory of
Supreme Court, 148 U. PA. L. REV. 743 (2000). 3. See Dinah Shelton, The Participation of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Judicial
and Purpose: A Comprehensive Approach to Strict Scrutiny after Adarand and Shaw, 149 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1, 55-67, 78-83 (2000). See, e.g., Ricci v
529 U.S. 362 (2000)). 9. See MICHELLE ALEXANDER, THE NEW JIM CROW: MASS INCARCERATION IN THE AGE OF COLORBLINDNESS 11 (2012). the yale law
Tragedies: Commons and Anticommons, 43 J.L. & Econ. 1, 4 (2000); Norbert Schulz et al., Fragmentation in Property: Towards a General Model, 158 J. Inst
Redmond-Issaquah Railroad Preservation Ass’n v. Surface Transportation Board, 223 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2000), which finds it unlikely that Congress
creating the allotment. 12. General Allotment (Dawes) Act of 1887, ch. 119, 24 Stat. 388, repealed by Indian Land Consol- idation Act Amendments of 2000
skyrocketed. But if the goal is to increase compliance with the law, the surge in funding has failed miserably. In 2000, just before the creation of