Search results for: "antitrust" (580 results)
companies, including but not limited to privacy rights, or by going after plat- form dominance structurally through antitrust law.73 Much, though not all, of
REV. 81, 85 (2018); see also Eric A. Posner, The Antitrust Challenge to Covenants Not to Compete in Employment Contracts, 83 ANTITRUST L.J. 165, 169
damage payments are concerned, even though the arguments rooted in notice and res judicata remain. See, e.g., In re Copper Antitrust Litig., 196 F.R.D
norm and quite legal”); Bennett Capers & Greg Day, Race-ing Antitrust, 121 Mich. L. Rev. 523, 528 (2023) (arguing that “antitrust law gauges consumer
tax laws were created at a time when racial bias . . . was the norm and quite legal”); Bennett Capers & Greg Day, Race-ing Antitrust, 121 MICH. L
Power: Explaining the Reagan Revolution in Antitrust, 34 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 269 (1990); Wood & Waterman, supra note 30. See, e.g., Arnold, supra note 10
number instead of the public law number. For example: RIGHT Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, ch. 323, § 7, 38 Stat. 730, 731–32. WRONG Clayton
faire governing philosophy with regulatory oversight—antitrust law in 1890, the Pure Food and Drug Act in 1906, the Federal Trade Commission in 1914
the overlapping antitrust authority of the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice can be justified on these grounds. Similarly
making calls.”). 41. See Frank Pasquale, Privacy, Antitrust, and Power, 20 GEO. MASON L. REV. 1009, 1022 (2013). 42. ANITA L. ALLEN, UNPOPULAR PRIVACY