Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
foreshadowed by the disputed 2000 presidential election. Even in this context, however, scholars focused primarily on problems associated with a lack
Econ. 715, 733 & n.37 (2000) (citing Schultz, supra note 1, and proposing a new economic approach that considers social identity to explain workplace
; Daria Roithmayr, Bar- riers to Entry: AMarket Lock-in Model of Discrimination, 86 Va. L. Rev. 727, 754 (2000) (“First, [Whites] enacted both formal Jim
; Richard H. Pildes, Democracy, Anti-Democracy, and the Canon, 17 Const. Comm. 295, 300-10 (2000) (recounting the disenfranchisement of Southern Black men
participation- and representation-based claims in this century. Since the tu- multuous 2000 election and the decision in Bush v. Gore,32 burdens on
between property and quasi-property in this context, see Radhika Rao, Property, Privacy, and the Human Body, 80 B.U. L. REV. 359, 382-87 (2000). 84. See
the Supreme Court 13. Paulsen, supra note 1, at 1833. 14. See Larry D. Kramer, The Supreme Court, 2000 Term—Foreword: We the Court, 115 HARV. L
possession is the present ability to control the land.” 10. See, e.g., Cagle v. Hammond, 57 So. 3d 150, 152 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010). 11. Nome 2000 v
Masur’s description. To test the theory more rigorously, I examined all published Federal Circuit patentability rulings during five years (1990, 2000
2000); Richard Thompson Ford, The Boundaries of Race: Political Geography in Legal Analysis, 107 HARV. L. REV. 1841 (1994). 11. Charles M. Tiebout, A