Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
6 See Pamela Samuelson, Privacy As Intellectual Property?, 52 STAN. L. REV. 1125 (2000); Jessica Litman, Information
6 See Pamela Samuelson, Privacy As Intellectual Property?, 52 STAN. L. REV. 1125 (2000); Jessica Litman
377, 399-405 (2000) (Breyer, J., concurring); United States v. Playboy Entm’t Grp., 529 U.S. 803, 835-47 (2000) (Breyer, J., dissenting); see also
Tribal Courts and the Indian Civil Rights Act, 69 Fordham L. Rev. 479, 491 (2000) (“As the Standard is applied over a series of cases, it almost always
F.3d 203, 213-14 (3d Cir. 2000). The also-important Second Circuit, which encompasses another popular destination for large Chapter 11 cases, the
normative project is emphasized. See ROBERT COOTER & THOMAS ULEN, LAW AND ECONOMICS 222 (3d ed. 2000) (“The courts reduce the costs of negotiating
3d 203, 213-14 (3d Cir. 2000). The also-important Second Circuit, which encompasses another popular destination for large Chapter 11 cases, the
Antimarket Dichotomy and the Legal Challenges of Inner-City Economic Development, 35 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 427, 439 (2000). 124. See supra note 12 and
manageability problems” with class actions); DEBORAH R. HENSLER ET AL., CLASS ACTION DILEMMAS: PURSUING PUBLIC GOALS FOR PRIVATE GAIN 445 (2000) (“Judges play
Institutional Racism: Judicial Conduct and a New Theory of Racial Dis- crimination, 109 YALE L.J. 1717 (2000); Diane S. Lauderdale, Birth Outcomes for