Search results for: "antitrust" (463 results)
plaintiffs in antitrust litigation. In re SGL Carbon Corp., 200 F.3d 154, 157 (3d Cir. 1999). The Third Circuit held that “filing . . . merely to
such as intellectual property, antitrust, business contracts, and international commercial and investment arbitration. These disputes are typically
know the views of key executive decision-makers on antitrust enforcement and how to avoid their scrutiny. They might know what areas appointees favor
WILLIAMSON, MARKETS AND HIERARCHIES: ANALYSIS AND ANTITRUST IMPLICATIONS (1975). This literature focuses on the costs of describing or specifying ex
policy team may know the views of key executive decision-makers on antitrust enforcement and how to avoid their scrutiny. They might know what areas
intent.”280 Two examples are illustrative. In 1922, the Court held that the Sherman Antitrust Act does not apply to Major League Baseball.281 Fifty
influence on the development of securities law). The Clayton Antitrust Act, Pub. L. No. 63-212, 38 Stat. 730 (1914) (codified as amended at 15 U.S.C. §§ 12
ANTITRUST, AND SOCIAL WELFARE LAW 3 (Gunther Teubner ed., 1987). 105. See, e.g., EDMUND BURKE, REFLECTIONS ON THE REVOLUTION IN FRANCE (Frank M. Turner
L. REV. 225, 232 (2010) (“States lack the resources to enforce either antitrust or consumer protection prohibitions against the insurance indus- try
in the Roosevelt Administration as Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division, before returning to