Search results for: "At" (3347 results)
at what Ralph Rossum has called the “excrescence” of flawed precedent,1 no matter how deeply en- trenched. He looks beyond the entrenchment to the
though they concretely apply to real world phenomena. At the same time, new and useful, but abstract, mathematical proofs may rely on poorly understood
in a way that I did not attempt to do in the Welfare Reform article. 38. See, e.g., BERKOWITZ, supra note 24, at 187-88; Samuel R. Bagenstos, The
the govern- ment at the top points of a triangle, trading control over children, who are situ- ated at the bottom point.17 Children’s dependency
ENG’RS, ATLAS OF NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT plate 6 (1911) [hereinafter ATLAS], available at http://images.library.yale.edu/ newhavensids/1911
255. 216. See Eminent Domain—State Jurisdiction, 8 Op. Att’y Gen. 30, 31 (1856). 217. Id. at 32-33. He separately questioned the state’s attempt to
203 (1996) (arguing that the Colorado amendment at issue in Romer could have been invalidated under the logic of the Bill of Attainder Clauses
makes no sense at all on the philosophical assumptions of atheism and thoroughgoing secularism—see Brian Leiter, Why Tolerate Religion (2013). My review
no. 4, 2014, at 1, 1-9, 19 (2014). 165. PECK, supra note 164, at xvi, 239. the law of informational capitalism 1491 Cohen is particularly attuned to