Search results for: "antitrust" (463 results)
to approve a civil antitrust settlement is without a standard and thus may not “admit[] of resolution by a court exercising the judicial power
rights and votes (as well as exit) must be brought into the same frame of analysis. That has been the modest ambition of this Article. ANTITRUST
patent rights to be cabined by related bodies of law such as antitrust. See generally GRAEME B. DINWOODIE & RO- CHELLE C. DREYFUSS, A NEOFEDERALIST
however, when the underlying dispute is legal in nature. For example, in Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover, the Supreme Court was faced with an antitrust
509 U.S. 764, 796 (1993) (recognizing the applicability of the Sherman Antitrust Act to “foreign conduct that was meant to produce and did in fact
Agencies, 79 COLUM. L. REV. 1435, 1466-68 (1979); William M. Landes, Optimal Sanctions for Antitrust Violations, 50 U. CHI. L. REV. 652, 655 (1983); A
thresholds across a range of baseline cardiovascular event rates . . . .”). 360. See Amgen, 987 F.3d at 1088. 361. See In re Humira Antitrust Litig., 465 F
offerings. See Joshua D. Wright, The Antitrust-Consumer Protection Paradox: Two Policies at War with Each Other, 121 YALE L.J. 2216 (2012); see also
647, § 6, 26 Stat. 209, 210 (1890) (same for forfeiture proceedings under federal antitrust law); see also 18 U.S.C. § 981(d) (1994) (same for many
other than identity, however, such as forms of economic discrimination addressed in antitrust law, is beyond this Article’s scope. Still, some of