Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
2 (June 2011), http://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03‌/GCDP‌ WaronDrugs EN.pdf http://perma.cc/FG4P-XUM8 (“The global war
of Alternative Work Arrangement in the United States, 1995-2015, at 2 (Nat’l Bureau of Econ. Rsch., Working Paper No. 22667, Sept. 2016), https
Decisions (in Administrative Law) 2 (Harv. Pub. L. Working Paper No. 13-24, 2013), http://ssrn.com/abstract=2239155 http://perma.cc/7EDE-UL6F, particularly
proscribed is hard to draw. 28. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)(2)(B). 29. Indeed, they are intertwined. Since consensual confirmation is not subject to the
358. 23. Id. at 358 n.12. 24. 422 U.S. 659, 661 (1975). 25. Id. at 680. 26. Id. at 682. the yale law journal 120:9 10 2 011 916
as should PTO officials developing guidelines for examiners. District judges or patent examiners could, 203. See supra Subsection I.A.2. 204
note 214, at 235-37; supra Section III.A.2. 265. See Amar, Two Tiers of Federal Jurisdiction, supra note 214, at 230-37. 266. Ordinarily, litigants can
2306 appendix a: study stimuli 2308 A. Study 1 2308 B. Study 2 2314 C. Study 3 2316 D. Study 4 2316 E. Study 5 2317 appendix b: demographic
www.riaa.org/ Napster.cfm (last visited Oct. 29, 2002). DAMSTEDTFINAL 2/27/2003 11:52 AM 2003] Limiting Locke 1221 is something intuitively
H.R. REP. NO. 23-276, at 2 (1834), quoted in WHITE, supra note 15, at 155. 210. See WHITE, supra note 15, at 155 & n.29. 211. OLIVER M