Search results for: "IF" (3763 results)
how best to interpret and apply RFRA, which provides: (a) In general. Government shall not substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion even if
“adequately” to represent the absent class members. If these conditions are satisfied, the proposed class must also fit into one of three functional
religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability, except as provided in subsection (b) of this section. (b) Exception. Government
comparative advantage, if any, lies in the tax field. I have covered this ground before, but I return to respond to the commentators who criticized my
treats offenders? If it is the latter, can the process be improved by reforms, such as changes to sentencing law? These questions are not new. For
exact rules, even if possible, can turn out to be unde- sirable. For example, a detailed code listing the maximum length of noncom- petes for various
formulate exactly which conduct should or should not be prohibited ahead of time. Moreover, exact rules, even if possible, can turn out to be unde- sirable
regulate. Policy-makers struggle to formulate exactly which conduct should or should not be prohibited ahead of time. Moreover, exact rules, even if
liability if it serves a “purpose to create or maintain a monopoly”). 4. 15 U.S.C. § 2 (2018). 5. See Trinko, 540 U.S. at 408 (“Under certain
considering preliminary injunctions should account for irreparable benefits in addition to irreparable harms. This is a provocative idea. If a