Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
Definitions and Principles of Interpretation.” 31. See U.C.C. § 1-203 cmt. 2 (2009) (“‘On common law theory, the lessor, since he has not parted
too). See, e.g., Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub. L. No. 88-352, tit. VII, 78 Stat. 241 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2(a) to (d) (2012
Democrats in those states. See Hasen, supra note 2. Bagenstos, Employment Law, supra note 5, at 245; see Cynthia L. Estlund, Wrongful Discharge Protec
Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety, D.C. Council, Report on Bill 20-930 (Nov. 26, 2014) ..................... 2, 4, 5, 6, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
28. 264. U.C.C. § 2-202. 265. U.C.C. art. 1. 266. Alternatively, whereas the U.C.C. governs private parties—contracting parties who had nothing
Appx. 437, 438 (7th Cir. 2002); Merrill v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, Nos. 22608-07, 3058-08, 2009 WL 20115106, at 2 n.2 (U.S. Tax. Ct. July 13, 2009
122. See, e.g., Ex parte Kim, No. 2009-010047, 2010 WL 3827134, at *2-4 (B.P.A.I. Sept. 28, 2010), available at http://des.uspto.gov/Foia/ReterivePdf
2003). STEPHENSON OP 10/14/2008 11:21:15 AM the yale law journal 118:2 2008 26 widespread in constitutional law than is generally
37. Lewinsohn, supra note 2, at 722-23, 741-44. 38. Id. at 723-24. 39. Id. 40. Id. 41. Lucy v. Zehmer, 84 S.E.2d 516 (Va. 1954). 42. Id. at 519
U.S.C. § 204(a) (2018); see also Act of June 20, 1874, ch. 333, § 2, 18 Stat. 113, 113 (declaring that published statutes will be “legal evidence” of