Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
1. 527 U.S. 581 (1999). 2. Ruth Colker, The Section Five Quagmire, 47 UCLA L. REV. 653, 654 (2000). 3. Olmstead, 527 U.S. at 593. 4. Id. at
Leave Their First Amendment Rights at the Schoolhouse Gates: What’s Left of Tinker?, 48 Drake L. Rev. 527, 542 (2000) (“There are literally dozens of
Immunoassays to Protein Chips, 21 Immunology Today 379, 379 (2000); Peter J. Hotez, David B. Corry, Ulrich Strych & Maria Elena Bottazzi, Comment
gains exceed net losses. See, e.g., ROBERT COOTER & THOMAS ULEN, LAW & ECONOMICS 43-44 (3d ed. 2000). 12. A Pareto improvement increases overall
; see also Nguyen v. Lindsey, 232 F.3d 1236, 1240 (9th Cir. 2000) (“It follows [from Berger and Mooney] that a prosecutor’s pursuit of fundamentally
Affirmative Action, 38 J. ECON. LITERATURE (NO. 3) 483, 508 (2000). 7. Sander, supra note 1, at 449-54. 8. See Paul W. Holland, Statistics and Causal
before it became a buzzword. In his 2000 commencement address at George Washington University Law School, he invoked the wonderful old Jimmy Stewart
3J5L. See Justices Let Others Pick Up Tab in Summer Travels, L.A. Times (June 28, 2000), https://www.lat… See Justices Let Others Pick Up Tab in
hearings on NSA surveillance, he answered that he had not misled Congress because once 18. 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(f) (2000). 19. “The President has
31. 381 U.S. 1 (1965). 32. 22 U.S.C. § 211(a) (2000). 33. Zemel, 381 U.S. at 8-9. 34. Id. at 17. 35. 299 U.S. 304, 319-22 (1936) (quoting