Search results for: "40" (2080 results)
generally understand disparate-impact law as re- dressing at least three types of discrimination.40 The first is covert intentional discrimination. As
Hayek would probably prefer to maxim- ize.40 Within Hayek’s social-evolutionary framework, however, substantive con- cerns regarding the protected
will get their energy.”40 Such a vast exercise of authority “raise[d]” the majority’s “eyebrow.”41 The major questions doctrine is not the only
www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/new-adr-development-mass-arbitrations-2021-12-22 https://perma.cc/2L68-G4ZW. Alison Frankel, Judge Breyer Rejects $40
protected. Compare John A. Robertson, Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies 39-40 (1994) (articulating the right to procreate
orientation is expressed through action—through the doing of all those “stereotypical things that society assesses to gays.”40 In placing applicants
the judiciary’s concerns, leaving any ambiguities to be resolved by the courts.40 Indeed, there is often no incentive for Congress to resolve
first case, the Court held that a determination by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board could have issue preclusive effect in federal court.40 In
claim by an individual actor or actress in his or her performance contained within a motion picture.”25 2:40 PM), http
resolve cases on statutory grounds other than personalization, where possible.40 Avoiding constitutional doubt may be sound policy most of the time, but