Search results for: "lE" (2380 results)
not expressly acknowledge the le- gal realist insight that a common-law system necessarily bestows significant dis- cretion on the decision-maker. As
ball.” 155 But in describing themselves as legal technicians in a common-law system, they do not expressly acknowledge the le- gal realist insight
commentators. See Swisher, supra note 10, at 523-31. 46. Compare Le Cras v. Hughes, (1782) 99 Eng. Rep. 549 (K.B.) (applying “factual expectation” test
were, . . . to create or perpetuate the le- gal, social, and economic inferiority of women.”152 The institutional history of the Nineteenth Amendment
to create or perpetuate the le- gal, social, and economic inferiority of women.”152 The institutional history of the Nineteenth Amendment
necessarily displaces some element of a pre-existing le- gal regime erected by the States.”251 Further, “the Elections Clause implicates federal rights
of political advocacy than a le- gal ruling. Its major accomplishment was that it shielded the federal judiciary from the political fallout of the
was a balancing act—more a piece of political advocacy than a le- gal ruling. Its major accomplishment was that it shielded the federal judiciary from
than le- gal, and didn’t depend on court enforcement. Still, the covenants imposed by neighborhood associations were often less effective than the