demands” by the plaintiffs in antitrust litigation. In re SGL Carbon Corp., 200 F.3d 154, 157 (3d Cir. 1999). The Third Circuit held that

b.1238.Haupt.1303 final

Commercial Speech and Antitrust Doctrine, 13 HASTINGS CONST. L.Q. 487 (1986); Ronald D. Rotunda, Lawyer Advertising and the Philosophical Origins of the

plaintiffs in antitrust litigation. In re SGL Carbon Corp., 200 F.3d 154, 157 (3d Cir. 1999). The Third Circuit held that “filing . . . merely to

0408_Young_0473

offered. 228. See id. at 1253, 1267. 229. See id. at 1235-36. 230. Id. at 1216. As examples, Eskridge and Ferejohn focus on the Sherman Antitrust

The President and Immigration Law Redux

Sherman Antitrust Act would be unconstitutional, along with myriad other laws. Such an argument would require a robust reinvigoration of the

Federal Questions and the Domestic-Relations Exception

legislative intent.” Two examples are illustrative. In 1922, the Court held that the Sherman Antitrust Act does not apply to Major League Baseball. Fifty

Sitkoff & Schanzenbach Final

securities, bankruptcy, environmental, secured transactions, welfare, and antitrust law, to name just a few.159 We have demonstrated that jurisdictional

Zoffer Note

policy team may know the views of key executive decision-makers on antitrust enforcement and how to avoid their scrutiny. They might know what areas

e.1364.Silverman.1427 final

intent.”280 Two examples are illustrative. In 1922, the Court held that the Sherman Antitrust Act does not apply to Major League Baseball.281 Fifty

Pozen

influence on the development of securities law). The Clayton Antitrust Act, Pub. L. No. 63-212, 38 Stat. 730 (1914) (codified as amended at 15 U.S.C. §§ 12