Search results for: "The" (6911 results)
be a mistake, therefore, to ignore such competitors on the basis of market definition. Accordingly, antitrust litigants and courts should use caution
agreed that it did not cover any statute conceiva- bly related to the sale and marketing of these products.4 They attempted to fash- ion criteria that a
religious schools from these programs? The Supreme Court resolved the first question two decades ago in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris.1 The Court there held
over the last several decades by social psychologists, criminologists, and legal theorists. As a result, there is now a rich body of theoretical and
vocations of national security by the Trump Administration, these new security claims may be both wide-ranging in their effects and difficult to reject out
security by the Trump Administration, these new security claims may be both wide-ranging in their effects and difficult to reject out of hand. In
section 2-108 provide a way for states to create their own separate rules for consumers, but the relationship between the U.C.C. and these other
limits on control, the argument goes, but they accept these limits as the price they must pay for limited liability. This theory is incorrect, because
American philosophers, among them Dworkin5) have limited themselves to the Anglo-American tradition that they know. The result, I believe, is that they
bounds such as the quota contemplated here is that they force these discussions to happen ex ante and create a binding mechanism that will not be eroded by