Search results for: "antitrust" (584 results)
ANTITRUST, AND SOCIAL WELFARE LAW 3 (Gunther Teubner ed., 1987). 105. See, e.g., EDMUND BURKE, REFLECTIONS ON THE REVOLUTION IN FRANCE (Frank M. Turner
WILLIAMSON, MARKETS AND HIERARCHIES: ANALYSIS AND ANTITRUST IMPLICATIONS (1975). This literature focuses on the costs of describing or specifying ex
know the views of key executive decision-makers on antitrust enforcement and how to avoid their scrutiny. They might know what areas appointees favor
L. REV. 225, 232 (2010) (“States lack the resources to enforce either antitrust or consumer protection prohibitions against the insurance indus- try
to approve a civil antitrust settlement is without a standard and thus may not “admit[] of resolution by a court exercising the judicial power
patent rights to be cabined by related bodies of law such as antitrust. See generally GRAEME B. DINWOODIE & RO- CHELLE C. DREYFUSS, A NEOFEDERALIST
thresholds across a range of baseline cardiovascular event rates . . . .”). 360. See Amgen, 987 F.3d at 1088. 361. See In re Humira Antitrust Litig., 465 F
however, when the underlying dispute is legal in nature. For example, in Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover, the Supreme Court was faced with an antitrust
rights and votes (as well as exit) must be brought into the same frame of analysis. That has been the modest ambition of this Article. ANTITRUST
Agencies, 79 COLUM. L. REV. 1435, 1466-68 (1979); William M. Landes, Optimal Sanctions for Antitrust Violations, 50 U. CHI. L. REV. 652, 655 (1983); A