Search results for: "9" (2500 results)
supra note 94, at Exhibit 2. 97. Thoms, 2021 WL 5162538, at *2. 98. Id. 99. Id. at *9. 100. No. 1:21-CV-00242-JDL, 2021 WL 4783626, at *1 (D. Me
to the spill”). 96. See Samsung’s Opposition, supra note 92, at 9 (“These e-mail solicitations reveal that . . . Labaton is using e-mail addresses
Relief, supra note 94, at Exhibit 2. 97. Thoms, 2021 WL 5162538, at *2. 98. Id. 99. Id. at *9. 100. No. 1:21-CV-00242-JDL, 2021 WL 4783626
9 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
Adjudication, 24 BERKELEY J. EMP. & LAB. L. 1, 22-30 (2003). 2. 9 U.S.C. § 7 (2000). 3. See, e.g., W. Scott Simpson & Omer Kesikli, The Contours of
cited supra note 9. 33. Leon, 468 U.S. at 921. 34. Id. at 917. BRAYFINAL.DOC 3/5/2004 12:41 PM 1150 The Yale Law Journal [Vol. 113: 1143 with this
818 THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM M A R C H 1 8 , 2 0 1 9 Sovereign Difference and Sovereign Deference on the Internet Jack Goldsmith
Inference (with Discussion), 81 J. AM. STAT. ASS’N 945 (1986) (discussing the formal statistical model of causal inference). 9. See Epstein & King
Reform Act of 1976, Pub. L. No. 94-210, § 205, 90 Stat. 31, 41 (codified as amended at 49 U.S.C. § 10704(a)(2)). 232. See 49 U.S.C. § 10101(1), (9), (11