Search results for: "350" (592 results)
§ 3501 (1994), enacted in 1968, had to be struck down in light of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). When the government refused to defend
; People v. Bahamadou, No. 4668-1999, 2011 WL 3503149 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Aug. 1, 2011); Neufville v. State, 13 A.3d 607 (R.I. 2011); Brea v. State, No. 2010
” 44 U.S.C. § 3502(5) (2012). See, e.g., Farina, supra note 5, at 506 n.231 (noting that “no blanket exemption for the independents thus far exists
Corporate Governance for Sustainability Statement 2-3 (2020), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3502101 [https://perma.cc/4CEN-4827]; Sjåfjell, supra note 38
www.bbc.com/news/technology-35077448 [https://perma.cc/36PE-64GG]; Edward Ongweso Jr., Uber Is Getting Sued Over Its Allegedly Racist Ratings System, VICE
26384, 69 Fed. Reg. 12922, 12933-34 (Mar. 18, 2004); Transfer Agents Operating Direct Registration System, Exchange Act Re- lease No. 35038, 58 SEC
18 U.S.C. § 3501 (2006). For decades, the Justice Department viewed the provision as constitutionally suspect and did not invoke it. After a federal
§§ 3501-21 (2006). 29. Exec. Order No. 12,866, 58 Fed. Reg. 51,735 (Sept. 30, 1993) (requiring regulatory impact analyses and OMB review); see Exec
them.156 Commenta- tors criticize various design elements of the EITC and CTC, including the phase- 153. Id. at 3508. 154. Off. of Inspections
§ 3501 note (2000 & Supp. 2002) (requiring agencies to conduct a Privacy Information Assessment before “developing or procuring information