Search results for: "2" (3480 results)
§ 2919.25(D) (LexisNexis 2009). BURKE_PRESS_V2WEB.DOC 4/27/2010 2:33:10 PM when family matters 1223 the victims’ preferences and even over
Act of 2011, Pub. L. No. 112-25, Sec. 101, §251(b)(2)(B)-(C), 125 Stat. 240, 242-43 (providing cap adjustments for HCFAC and continuing disability
CONST. art. I, § 2; N.Y. CONST. art. I, § 11; and TEX. CONST. art. I, § 3. 208. Resnik, supra note 203, at 2133, 2135-36 (describing how after
Fifteenth Amendment’s adoption); 2 The Reconstruction Amendments: The Essential Documents 435-599 (Kurt T. Lash ed., 2021) hereinafter The Essential
cancellation.” U.C.C. § 2-608 cmt. 1 (2003). Confusion remained nonetheless. See Welken v. Conley, 252 N.W.2d 311, 315 (N.D. 1977). This is due in part to
%20overlooked%20requirement%20for%20c /files/view%20complete%20article/fileattachment/bna feldman newman schumaker(2).pdf http://perma.cc/73JK-N4FJ. Even in
203. No. 016055, slip op. (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Apr. 6, 2004) (on file with author). 204. See id., slip op. at 2. 205. See id., slip op. at 2-3. 206
HUTCHINSONFINAL 2/11/2003 2:21 PM 983 Credos Dennis J. Hutchinson† When Byron White moved in the spring of 2001 from Washington, D.C., where
& Bernard Grofman eds., forthcoming 2014). 22. Pildes, supra note 2, at 760. 23. See Issacharoff, Discrimination Model, supra note 2, at 121-23. 24
2013 2088 Defendant [2] 66. On this occasion, Defendant [2] summoned Jane Doe 1 to the P Building on the WCCW grounds, stating that he