Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
culpable than white defendants when evidence is ambiguous). See Sommers & Ellsworth, White Juror Bias, supra note 2, at 225; see also Sommers & Ellsworth
this basic question without the type of expensive and time-consuming restoration steps that Rule 26(b)(2)(B) is intended to avoid unless a good-cause
; Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War arts. 2 & 3, Aug. 12, 1949, 6 U.S.T. 3516, 75 U.N.T.S. 287. For a discussion
postponed to May 20, 2006. See La. Exec. Order No. KBB 2006-2 (Jan. 24, 2006), http://www.legis.state.la.us/katrina/eoorders/06-02.pdf. 74. Cf. id. at 1
215. Id. at 2. 216. Id. 217. Act of Mar. 24, 1976, Pub. L. No. 94-241, § 401, 90 Stat. 263, 266 (codified at 48 U.S.C. § 1811 (2018)); see also
; MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 276, § 58A(2)(B) (West 2005); UTAH CODE ANN. § 77-20-10 (LexisNexis 2003) (bail on appeal); N.C. 26th JUDICIAL DIST. BAIL POLICY
note 71. 74. See American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Pub. L. No. 117-2, § 2004, 135 Stat. 4, 24-27 (prohibiting states from disproportionately cutting
Guarantees and Stock Pledges 2721 Â 2. Â Subordinated Primary Creditors 2727 Â iii. implications for law and theory 2729 Â A. Â Good-Faith
be Friday, October 2, at 5PM. Please refer to the rest of this memorandum for guidance on developing and submitting your Note. The Notes & Comments
27-06 9/25/2006 11:59:51 PM the yale law journal 115:2611 2006 2618 The four-year pattern of a federal election cycle is shown in Figure 2