Search results for: "law" (7491 results)
“proportionality principle” for law- 54. See Lawrence Rosenthal, Pragmatism, Originalism, Race, and the Case Against Terry v. Ohio, 43 TEX. TECH. L. REV. 299, 300
punishing nonactualized thoughts); Adil Ahmad Haque, Lawrence v. Texas and the Limits of the Criminal Law, 42 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 1, 37 (2007
the state from punishing nonactualized thoughts); Adil Ahmad Haque, Lawrence v. Texas and the Limits of the Criminal Law, 42 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 1
this view, disparate-impact law is an extension of individual-focused antidiscrimination norms. Given laws pro- hibiting discrimination, “few
and criminal-law cases, as well as cases challenging the constitutionality of state laws.56 49. Ohio v. Wyandotte Chems. Corp., 401 U.S. 493, 496
THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM N O V E M B E R 1 5 , 2 0 2 3 abstract. introduction 1 2 3 1 2 3 the yale law journal
The conservative legal movement accused the judges, lawyers, and professors in po- sitions of power in the legal community of ignoring the law in favor
The conservative legal movement accused the judges, lawyers, and professors in po- sitions of power in the legal community of ignoring the law in
number of principles to guide the legislature in pursuing lawmaking authorized by the natural law. The first set of requirements deals with the
technologies, in violation of federal laws prohibiting sex discrimination, in- cluding pregnancy discrimination.20 Central to the family-law context