Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
F.3d 1062, 1066-67 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Metcalf v. Daley, 214 F.3d 1135, 1141 (9th Cir. 2000)). nepa eiss and substantive regulatory regimes
First Amendment, 29 ARIZ. ST. L.J. 473 (1997); Robert Post, The Constitutional Status of Commercial Speech, 48 UCLA L. REV. 1 (2000); Post
By Elizabeth M. Schneider.* New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000. Pp. 317. $29.95. In Battered Women and Feminist Lawmaking,1 Elizabeth Schneider
Kranton, Economics and Identity, 3 Q. J. ECON. 715, 733 & n.37 (2000) (citing Schultz, supra note 1, and proposing a new economic approach that
”). 2. 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 (2000). The Act creates civil liability, including penalties and treble damages, for any person who knowingly presents
violations, last employing the standard in 2000. In the years following Batson, lower courts shifted away from the “solely” standard and began applying
2000). And, certainly, there were geographic differences even among the early states in the meaning of “honor.” Professor Wyatt-Brown argues, for
due to problems akin to those affecting Florida in 2000, and proposing a nonbinding rating system to encourage the adop- tion of good-governance
4. 60. Id. at 10. 61. Akhil Reed Amar, The Supreme Court, 1999 Term—Foreword: The Document and the Doctrine, 114 HARV. L. REV. 26, 82-83 (2000