Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
in the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability?, 109 YALE L.J. 1087 (2000). 2. E.g., Richard L. Cupp, Jr., The Continuing Search for Proper
Blueprint 2000 and Tallahassee-Leon County Planning Director, 1-3 (Aug. 11, 2011), https://blueprintia.org/wp-content/uploads/2011-Interlocal
Yale Law Journal. See Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495, 518 (2000) (citing Stuart Minor Benjamin, Equal Protection and the Special Relationship: The Case
to decide the issue, and the degree to which the rule affects substantive rights. 1. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2071-2077 (2000). 2. Id. § 2072(b). 3. 127
conviction). 3. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1346 (2000) (wire fraud); id. § 1956(a)(1)(B), (a)(2), (h) (money laundering); id. § 2314 (ITSP). 4. U.S. prosecutors
U.S.C. § 112b (2000)), was yet another effort by Congress to monitor executive agreements. It requires that binding agreements concluded outside the
U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i) (2000) (emphasis added). 143. 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a) (2000); 42 U.S.C. § 2000d (2000). 144. Gonzaga, 536 U.S. at 284
carriers under the Clayton Act. 15 U.S.C. § 21(a) (2000). 7. Id. § 18. 8. Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, Pub. L. No. 94-435, 90
that is admitted 6. See, e.g., infra notes 20, 42. 7. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) (2000). 8. The term “prior act” rather than “extrinsic act” is
One is Twitter’s attempt to disconnect PeopleBrowsr, discussed at the beginning of this Part. A second relates to a 2000 dispute between eBay and