Search results for: "n" (3654 results)
overlooked in the subsequent literature. See, e.g., Sachs, supra note 6, at 506-07, 507 n.34 (citing Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley’s analysis for the
we are now moving to a whole host of less crystalline, more nuanced forms of international legal engagement and cooperation that do not fall neatly
thanks to William N. Eskridge, Jr. for his guidance and encouragement throughout the writing process. I am also indebted to the insightful
slightest thought. See Norman Abrams, Uncovering the Legislative Histories of the Early Mail Fraud Statutes, 5 Utah L. Rev. 1079, 1124 n.165 (2021). × Cf
American Empire 61, 74 (Gerald L. Neuman & Tomiko Brown-Nagin eds., 2015) (“It is now an unassailable fact that what we have in the United States-Puerto
footnote: Natural law was not n… Hamburger’s only engagement with this issue is an unilluminating footnote: Natural law was not necessarily the only
Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 (NAMUDNO) v. Gonzales | Yale Law Journal Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 (NAMUDNO
Nomos LV (James Fleming ed., forthcoming 2014); see also Rodríguez, supra note 115 (also emphasizing the diversity of federalism’s forms). William N
also that ‘n the general, nations not owing a common allegiance are foreign to each other.’” Id. at 1707 (quoting Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S
combatting Native American voter suppression. First, it advances a new jurisprudential theory centered on tribal sovereignty: suppressing the Native vote not