Search results for: "2" (3479 results)
as should PTO officials developing guidelines for examiners. District judges or patent examiners could, 203. See supra Subsection I.A.2. 204
note 214, at 235-37; supra Section III.A.2. 265. See Amar, Two Tiers of Federal Jurisdiction, supra note 214, at 230-37. 266. Ordinarily, litigants can
www.riaa.org/ Napster.cfm (last visited Oct. 29, 2002). DAMSTEDTFINAL 2/27/2003 11:52 AM 2003] Limiting Locke 1221 is something intuitively
2306 appendix a: study stimuli 2308 A. Study 1 2308 B. Study 2 2314 C. Study 3 2316 D. Study 4 2316 E. Study 5 2317 appendix b: demographic
H.R. REP. NO. 23-276, at 2 (1834), quoted in WHITE, supra note 15, at 155. 210. See WHITE, supra note 15, at 155 & n.29. 211. OLIVER M
disclosures under 29 C.F.R. § 2550.408b- 2(c)(1)(iv) (2023), and investment-related disclosures under 29 C.F.R. § 2550.404a-5 (2023). Collective Investment
SUBMISSIONS 2 WEEKLY SUBMISSION TOTALS Date V123 V124 V125 Feb. 1-7 31 63 173 Feb. 8-14 200 155 162 Feb. 15-21 249 284 233 Feb. 22-28 180 181
CONST. art. III, § 28). 20. IND. CODE ANN. § 3-3-2-2 (LexisNexis 2012). 21. CONN. CONST. art. III, § 6(b). 22. For instance, Mississippi’s
COLLINS & LEIB, supra note 2, at 22-24, 76-81. MARKEL_PRESS_V1WEB.DOC 5/28/2010 6:10:57 PM the yale law journal 119:1864 2010 1874 1. Situating