Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
executive branch, which has the best 1. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (2000). 2. See Small v. United States, 544 U.S. 385, 388-89 (2005). 3. Cf. EEOC v
220, 245 (2005). 6. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)-(b) (2000). JOHNSON FORMATTED_08-28-06 12/6/2006 6:01:27 PM sentencing organizations after booker 635
Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000). Although this decision and the FDA rule dealt both with smokeless tobacco and with cigarettes, this Review often
cases, most notably constitutional tort actions, see, for example, Mark R. Brown, Weathering Constitutional Change, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 1091; and
Cir. 1995) (per curiam). 141. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) (2000). 142. MICH. COMP. LAWS § 37.2202(1) (2007). 143. See, e.g., Frank v. United
characterize taxable income. 10. See Internal Revenue Code, ch. 1, § 41, 53 Stat. 1, 24 (1939) (codified as amended at I.R.C. § 446 (2000
Federal Computer Crime Laws, 16 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 177, 183-87 (2000) (recognizing three primary types of hacking: (1
currency.php (last visited Dec. 15, 2008). 11. See I.R.C. § 61 (2000); Bryan T. Camp, The Play’s the Thing: A Theory of Taxing Virtual Worlds, 59
influence of U.S. jurisprudence on Canadian law). 23. See 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 3553(e), 3742 (West 2000 & Supp. 2005); 28 U.S.C.A. § 994(w) (West 2000 & Supp
2. 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A) (2000). 3. 20 I. & N. Dec. 819 (B.I.A. 1990). 4. Reno Designates Gay Case as Precedent, 71 INTERPRETER RELEASES