Search results for: "262" (836 results)
have interests of a comparable magnitude in being per- 18. Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1, 12 (1967). 19. Id. See also Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S
could not appear,12 (2) could not control the litigation,13 (3) 8. See id. at 97, 40 I.L.M. at 262. 9. See id. at 98, 40 I.L.M. at 263. 10
2013 262 Once the Court made it explicit in Stenberg that this included a health exception that encompassed the notion that women should not be
irrelevant characteristic. This characterization of race re- lies on a phenotype-centric notion of race, what Neil Gotanda calls “formal race.”262 If race
504-05; Michael A. Helfand, When Judges Are Theologians: Adjudicating Religious Questions, in RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON LAW AND RELIGION 262, 277-79 (Rex
2211 tives as strategic efforts towards a comprehensive national plan.262 Scholarly advocates of local reparations have echoed these sentiments.263
Theologians: Adjudicating Religious Questions, in RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON LAW AND RELIGION 262, 277-79 (Rex Ahdar ed., 2018). sincerity, religious
consequences under various SCR state statutory schemes). See, e.g., N.Y. Fam. Ct. Act § 262(a) (McKinney 2012) (detailing an individual’s right to
Secretary of the United States Dep’t of Health and Human Servs., 2016 WL 659222, at 53 (11th Cir. 2016) (Tjoflat, J., dissenting). Id. at 262
the Supreme Court’s sweeping 87. South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301, 324 (1966). 88. 262 U.S. 447, 485 (1923). 89. See Woolhandler