Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
1305, 93rd Cong., 2d Sess. (1974). 21. U.S. CONST. art. I, § 5, cl. 2. 22. See CHAFETZ, supra note 8, at 210 (noting that there are no
Contributions: Tax Deductions or Matching Grants, 28 TAX L. REV. 37 (1972). SIMON V122021 (POST OP, POST FLIP) 2/6/2006 5:54:51 PM the yale law journal 115:751
history demands that we 256. See MCRAE, supra note 16, at 240; THEOHARIS, supra note 2, at 3-27; see also sources cited infra note 258. 257. See
v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 & n.2 (2009); United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 909, 921 & n.22 (1984); Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206
be beyond the purview of antitrust law.30 27. Erika M. Douglas, Monopolization Remedies and Data Privacy, 24 VA. J.L. & TECH. 2, 25-26 (2020
negligently with respect to the material elements of that offense.2 MPC section 2.02(1) es- tablishes that for a person to be guilty of an offense, they must
perma.cc/M3HG -VBH4]. 2. See, e.g., Deepa Seetharaman, Facebook’s ‘Destroy Mode’—Myth or Reality?, WALL ST. J. (July 29, 2020, 9:10 PM ET
Unemployment Rates During the COVID-19 Pandemic 1-2 (2021), https://sgp… Cong. Rsch. Serv., R46554, Unemployment Rates During the COVID-19 Pandemic 1-2 (2021
sanctioned-using-fake-chatgpt-cases-legal-brief-2023-06-22 https://perma.cc/H5RX-RMTA. 36. See Brescia et al., supra note 2, at 554 (“Many assess the
legally cognizable, as racial injury). Petition for a Writ of Certiorari at 2, Rahimi, 144 S. Ct. 1889 (No. 22-915), 2023 WL 2600091, at 1 (internal