Search results for: "IF" (3032 results)
re- straint. If the government cannot prove that a criminal sentence is necessary to achieve a compel- ling state interest, the sentence is
Delaware’s dominance if such a challenge could have been expected to succeed in enabling them to capture a significant fraction of these profits. That
is.” If Justice Kennedy is correct, then courts retain inherent habeas jurisdiction even in areas—like expedited removal—that lie deep in the heart
not matter if the relevant provision of the Affordable Care Act was poorly written. In other words, even unambiguous legislative history may fail to
claimed, if the purpose of adverse possession were to transfer titles to higher-valued uses, then use of a liability rule rather than a property rule
offender, even if they do not resolve the fundamental tension between individualized sentencing and the rigid quantification that characterizes the
tradition of Lord Mansfield. This conclusion offers insights into how the Supreme Court might negotiate a jury trial in a future case if the Seventh Amendment
to renegotiate because their bonds are backed by AIG credit default swaps that will pay in full if GM files for bankruptcy). B&R_PDF.DOC 2/26/2010 5
cutpoint to the right of the Federal Circuit in the first instance. If the PTO were perfectly accurate and perfectly responsive, it could simply adapt