Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
Mentz at 1, Standing Rock, 205 F. Supp.3d 4 (D.D.C. Sept. 2, 2016) (No. 16-1534) [hereina�er Mentz Declaration II]. 63. Id. at 2. 64. Id. at 2-3. 65
ING OF THE 1960s, 216-18 (2016). 26. Lvovsky, supra note 2, at 2003-08. 27. Id. at 2008-12. 28. Id. at 2016-25. 29. DAVID H. KAYE, DAVID E
Sections I.B.1-2; see also Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 290 (1983) (Brennan, J., dissenting) (describing “commonsense” in this context as “code
See id. at 245; see also id. at 246 n.2 (“A detection dog recognizes an odor, not a drug, and should alert whenever the scent is present, even if the
See Appendix II in the print and PDF versions of this Feature. Ind Code § 4-6-2-1 (2011); N.C. Gen. Stat. § 114-2 (2014); N.M. Stat. Ann. § 8-5-2
Id. at 211. 294. 44 Me. 521, 548 (1857) (opinion of Appleton, C.J.). 295. Id. 296. See, e.g., 2 GEORGE TICKNOR CURTIS, HISTORY OF THE ORIGIN
Terrorism? It Depends Who You Ask, Vox (Mar. 21, 2018, 12:20 PM EDT), https://www.vox.com/2017/10/2/9868048/austin-bombings -terrorism-definition https
U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(B)(v) (2018); 8 C.F.R. § 208.30(e)(2)-(3) (2023). 65. Grace v. Barr, 965 F.3d 883, 902 (D.C. Cir. 2020). 66. Asencio & Gendelman
Int’l, Inc., 763 F. Supp. 2d 671, 682-83 (D. Del. 2010) (“approximately”). 218. See supra Subsection II.B.2. 219. Marine Polymer Techs., Inc. v
291. See infra Subsection III.A.2. 292. See, e.g., People v. Coleman, 79 P. 283, 284 (Cal. 1904); People v. Ratner, 153 P.2d 790, 790 (Cal. App. Dep’t