Search

Search results for: "2" (3498 results)

Against Ventriloquizing Children: How Students’ Rights Disguise Adult Culture Wars | Yale Law Journal

Summary of School Safety Statistics 1-2 (2017), https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/250610.pdf https://perma.cc/9CXX-DQ55. On the culture wars and the

The Prison Discovery Crisis

M.D. La. June 24, 2019), ECF No. 43-2; Declaration of Richard Keller at 2-7, Berry, No. 17-cv-00318 (M.D. La. Mar. 26, 2017), ECF No. 43-3. See

Microsoft Word - Bartow_Final PDF.doc

shipped materials. See id. 21. Id. § 2257(h)(2)(b)(i). 22. Id. § 2257(h)(2)(b)(ii) and (iii). 23. Id. § 2257(h)(2); 28 C.F.R. § 75.1(c)(4) (2007

Forum: Did Bristol-Myers Squibb Kill the Nationwide Class Action?

BMS, 137 S. Ct. 1773, 1781 (2017)); see also Garvey v. Am. Bankers Ins. Co. of Fla., 2019 WL 2076288, at 2 (N.D. Ill. May 10, 2019) (citing Practice

Microsoft Word - 977a.doc

2 Cranch) 64, 118 (1804)). 109. See id. at 202. 110. Id. (footnote omitted). 111. Id. at 220. But see United States v. Corey, 232 F.3d 1166

Microsoft Word - Brady.docx

1662]; 2 ANCIENT TOWN REC- ORDS: NEW HAVEN TOWN RECORDS 1662-1684, at 39, 47, 78, 124, 128, 175, 195, 213, 214, 224, 240, 241, 260, 265, 280, 281

Present at Antitrust’s Creation: Consumer Welfare in the Sherman Act’s State Statutory Forerunners | Yale Law Journal

Antitrust in the Formative Years of the Modern Oil Industry, 29 Washburn L.J. 270, 275 (1990) (quoting 2 Clarence Wharton, Texas Under Many Flags 418

Microsoft Word - a.248.Pasachoff.335.docx

2566, 2603 (2012) (plurality opin- ion). 82. NASBO 2011-2013, supra note 45, at 2. 83. NASBO 2010-2012, supra note 80, at 2. 84. Id. 85. In 2011

Tailoring Regimes for a Designer Drug: Developing Civil Liability for Retailers of Synthetic Marijuana

health and social impacts”); War on Drugs: Report of the Global Commission on Drug Policy, Global Commission on Drug Pol’y 2 (June 2011), http

The Antitrust Duty to Deal in the Age of Big Tech

cv-03590 (JEB), 2021 WL 2643627, at 23 (D.D.C. June 28, 2021) (stating, in a section 2 case, that “‘conditional dealing’ schemes are thus