Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
BREST ET AL., PROCESSES OF CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONMAKING 378-97 (4th ed. 2000) (discussing World War I and the First Amendment cases); id. at 704-24
Applicable Laws and Exceptions from Smith, 75 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1045 (2000); and Oleske, supra note 7, at 697-98, 719 (arguing that Smith broke with
1970s to 2000, American Needle maintained a nonexclusive license to design and manufacture headgear bearing logos and names of the NFL and its
Ellsworth, Race in the Courtroom: Perceptions of Guilt and Dispositional Attributions, 26 Personality & Soc. Psychol. Bull. 1367, 1378 (2000
not limited to devices.8 5. 21 U.S.C. § 360k(a) (2000). 6. Exemptions from Federal Preemption of State and Local Medical Device Requirements, 21
Justice, to author (Dec. 22, 2008) (on file with author) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6) (2000)). 18. See, e.g., U.S. Dep’t of Justice v. Reporters
Virtual World Feudalism, 118 YALE L.J. POCKET PART 126 (2000), http://thepocketpart.org/2009/01/19/ grimmelmann.html. 27. Bragg v. Linden Research Inc., 487 F. Supp. 2d ...
2000, however, Congress rolled back those extensions. While claimants still have the burden of proof with respect to forfeitures under customs
SOCIALE GEOGRAFIE [J. ECON. & SOC. GEOGRAPHY] 85, 89-90 (2000) (Neth.). 14. Article X of the Treaty of Utrecht of 1713 grants Spain a right of first
3d 1262, 1266-67 (9th Cir. 2000) (applying the substantial evidence standard to state agency factfinding in a suit under the federal