Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
published in 2010 by Alfred A. Knopf. the yale law journal 120: 1999 2011 2000 I hear these latter questions asked frequently by judges from
Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors, 55 J. FIN. 773, 795 (2000) (“[T]hose inves- tors
of cases and the option most re- stricted even under the mature-minor doctrine. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Nixon, 761 A.2d 1151, 1155-56 (Pa. 2000
did not approve the final draft until 1969. See Louise Weinberg, A Structural Revision of the Con- flicts Restatement, 75 IND. L.J. 475, 486 (2000
2000), http://brennan.3cdn.net/fd31c8d619df2eaa6b _kvm6booo3.pdf; Restricting Legal Services: How Congress Left the Poor With Only Half a Lawyer
to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors, 55 J. FIN. 773, 795 (2000) (“[T]hose inves- tors who trade most
2010) (remanding without ruling on lawfulness); Mich- igan v. EPA, 213 F.3d 663, 693 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (remanding but not vacating without analy- sis
CACY IN A DEMOCRATIC AGE 146-47 (2008). 15. See DEBORAH L. RHODE, IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE (2000); WILLIAM H. SIMON, THE PRACTICE OF JUSTICE (1998
U.S. 362, 412-13 (2000) (interpreting AEDPA’s “contrary to” federal law requirement); Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 105 (2011) (applying AEDPA
& Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000); United States v. Estate of Romani, 523 U.S. 517, 532 (1998); United States v. Fausto, 484 U.S