Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
David Barron, Constitutionalism in the Shadow of Doctrine: The President’s Non-Enforcement Power, LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS., Winter/Spring 2000, at 61
One might, as the Court did in Cleveland v. United States, 531 U.S. 12, 25-26 (2000), and McNally, ground this “property” analysis in the 1909
Double Jeopardy: A Champion of Justice or a Violation of a Fundamental Right?, 14 EMORY INT’L L. REV. 1641, 1671-74 (2000); Michael A. Dawson, Note
; Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Principles of Fairness Versus Human Welfare: On the Evaluation of Legal Policy (Nov. 2000), at http
; Kenneth Einar Himma, H.L.A. Hart and the Practical Difference Thesis, 6 LEGAL THEORY 1, 26-27 (2000); Frederick Schauer, Authority and Authorities
Berkeley, Chicago, Stanford, and University of San Diego Law and Economics Seminars and the 2000 ALEA meeting in New York. Chris Busselle, Erin
in 1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. 699. 54. 18 U.S.C. § 248 (2000). 55. BENJAMIN N. CARDOZO, THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL PROCESS 168 (1921). See generally NEAL
Jeremy Waldron, Pildes on Dworkin’s Theory of Rights, 29 J. Legal Stud. 301, 302 (2000). I leave that debate aside and simply borrow Pildes’s
Law: What Happened? Why? And What Can We Do About It?, 21 Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 91, 140 (2000) (“In the area of disability, the instinctive
Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors, 55 J. Fin. 773, 795 (2000) (“Those investors who trade most