Search results for: "n" (3655 results)
namely concerns about the reliability and validity of the processes. Specifically, the 1992 NRC report noted the potential for errors arising from
supra note 3, at 903 & n.116; see also ALA. CODE § 13A-1-6 cmt. (noting that “[t]he original draft expressly abolished the common law rule that penal
N.Y.S.2d 349, 360 n.3 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009) (Peters, J., dissenting), aff’d as modified, 930 N.E.2d 217 (N.Y. 2010). 50. Id. the yale law
mmwrhtml/00001163.htm [https://perma.cc/6BR6 -QJHS]. 32. See HOPPE, supra note 29, at 243 n.41. 33. See COLO. REV. STAT. § 18-3-415.5 (2020); NEV
serves to de- 54. Henderson, supra note 8, at 373. 55. Id. at 410 n.155 (first citing Commonwealth v. Mobley, 160 S.W.3d 783, 784 (Ky. 2005); and
See Foster, supra note 9 (arguing same in stare decisis context); cf. William N. Eskridge, Jr., No Frills Textualism, 119 HARV. L. REV. 2041, 2072
customers to law-abiding ones, to encourage stoutheartedness in nervous neophytes at crime, and so on. Not necessarily, Yaffe says. A cashier could
17 This discussion provides a context in which to place the two models described by this Note. The Sixth Amendment provides that “[i]n all criminal
v. Ten- nessee, 501 U.S. 808, 828 (1991))). William N. Eskridge, Jr. would call the more diffuse reli- ance claims not rooted in property or contract
172. Nadler, Scattershot Policing, supra note 3, at 98. 173. See, e.g., Nadler, No Need to Shout, supra note 3, at 220 n.244. 174. See, e.g