Search results for: "1002" (189 results)
Sacklers—and their money—are spread across the world. See Casey & Macey, supra note 3, at 1002-03. If GBZ and other critics want more nonbankruptcy
and 115. Id. 116. Id. at 936-37. 117. Allen v. Milligan, 599 U.S. 1, 16 (2023) (quoting Singleton v. Merrill, 582 F. Supp. 3d 924, 1002 (N.D
v. U.S. Forest Serv., 883 F. Supp. 2d 979, 1002 (D. Or. 2012) (“The agency does not need to consider re- mote or speculative alternatives
summary judgment for the state and school districts. Peter v. Wedl, 155 F.3d 992, 996, 1002 (8th Cir. 1998) (citations omitted). The families prevailed
because the Sacklers—and their money—are spread across the world. See Casey & Macey, supra note 3, at 1002-03. If GBZ and other critics want more
written about winning through losing on these terms.27 20. Id. at 989-94. 21. Id. at 1002-11. 22. Id. at 945 (emphasis added). 23. Id. at 983
explaining FTC authorities). 478. Kovacic & Winerman, supra note 304, at 1002. 479. Id. at 1004; see also 2021 Khan Statement, supra note 310, at 3
States ex rel. Stevens, 529 U.S. 765, 772 (2000). 332. Id. 333. 570 U.S. 693 (2013). 334. See Perry v. Brown, 265 P.3d 1002 (Cal. 2011) (so
232 n.100 (explaining FTC authorities). 478. Kovacic & Winerman, supra note 304, at 1002. 479. Id. at 1004; see also 2021 Khan Statement, supra note 310
commanding a majority of the Court. Goldwater, 444 U.S. at 1002 (Rehnquist, J., concurring) (providing the opinion of four Justices who found the issue a