Search results for: "2" (3519 results)
applies to federal question actions.”); Ashmore v. New York, No. 12-CV-3032(JG), 2012 WL 2377403, at 2 (E.D.N.Y. June 25, 2012) (finding a
38. See Greenberg, Legislation as Communication?, supra note 2, at 230-33, 241-50. 39. See id. at 222-26, 229-30; Greenberg, The Standard
215. Id. at 2. 216. Id. 217. Act of Mar. 24, 1976, Pub. L. No. 94-241, § 401, 90 Stat. 263, 266 (codified at 48 U.S.C. § 1811 (2018)); see also
Terrify”: State Antitrust in the Formative Years of the Modern Oil Industry, 29 Washburn L.J. 270, 275 (1990) (quoting 2 Clarence Wharton, Texas Under
note 71. 74. See American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Pub. L. No. 117-2, § 2004, 135 Stat. 4, 24-27 (prohibiting states from disproportionately cutting
27-06 9/25/2006 11:59:51 PM the yale law journal 115:2611 2006 2618 The four-year pattern of a federal election cycle is shown in Figure 2
Civil Action No. 758-CC, 2009 WL 3165613 (Del. Ch. Oct. 2, 2009). 2. Id. at *12. 3. See Mills Acquisition Co. v. Macmillan, Inc., 559 A.2d
2000). 2 See, e.g., Louis Henkin, U.S. Ratification of Human Rights Conventions: The Ghost of Senator Bricker, 89 AMER. J. INT’L LAW 341 (1995
be Friday, October 2, at 5PM. Please refer to the rest of this memorandum for guidance on developing and submitting your Note. The Notes & Comments
2002 regulation: 8. See ACLU, ACLU ANALYSIS OF OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S PROGRESS IMPROVING IMMIGRATION DETENTION SYSTEM 2 (2010), http