Search results for: "n" (3655 results)
219 n.63 (Melanie Fink ed., 2024). But see Albiston, supra note 25, at 70 (“Noth- ing about NeJaime’s argument suggests that the benefits of loss
”); Baradaran, supra note 20, at 745 n.131, 752 (documenting state court decisions allowing consideration of dangerousness and noting that “[o]ver time, states
expand their authority to adjudicate disputes. 122. See id. at 9 n.18. 123. See id.; see also NAT’L ASS’N OF ATTORNEYS GEN., supra note 10, at 99-104
theHatch Act 78. See id. at 92 n.24. 79. See id. at 98-100. 80. 513 U.S. 454, 477 (1995). 81. See U.S. Off. of Special Couns., OSC File Nos. HA-19-0631 &HA
owes an unwavering duty of loyalty to his or her client, the nature of that duty is not as universally agreed upon—or nearly as unbounded—as Fox
No. 11-cv-06714-YGR, 2021 WL 75741 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2021); Blix Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 19-1869-LPS, 2020 WL 7027494 (D. Del. Nov. 30, 2020
constituted a search); see also id. at 2217 n.3 (“[W]e need not decide whether there is a limited period for which the Government may obtain an
357 (citation omitted); see also id. at 357 n.185 (noting that “Justice Stevens’ opinion in Memphis is itself an example of how a decision need not
the workplace hierarchy, have no right to their job, nor any voice in dictating the conditions of their employment. They are vulnerable not only to
couples following Loving, see Nicolas, supra note 4, at 424-25. 8. Albertina Antognini, The Law of Nonmarriage, 58 B.C. L. REV. 1, 18 n.83 (2017); see