Search results for: "2" (3522 results)
V acate T otal A-1 33 16 52 5 1 1 4 3 115 A-2 1 7 13 0 0 1 2 1 25 A-3 10 19 33 3 2 1 8 1 77 A-4 5 22 155 22 2 5 5 2 218 B-1 5 11 28 4 0 0 2 0
Douglas, Monopolization Remedies and Data Privacy, 24 Va. J.L. & Tech. 2, 25-26 (2020). See, e.g., Statement of Federal Trade Commission Concerning
LLC v. 721 Logistics, LLC, 40 F. Supp. 3d 437, 454 n.4 (E.D. Pa. 2014) (discussing civil conspiracy). 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e–2(a)(1) to (2), (m) (2012
Unauthorized Appeal at 2-4, 170-71, State v. Guzman Curipoma, 652 S.W.3d 74 (Tex. App. 2022) (No. 03-22-00032-CR) (attaching a transcript of the pretrial
L. PROJECT 2 (2014), https://www.nelp.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03 /Seizing-Ban-the-Box-Momentum-Advance-New-Generation-Fair-Chance-Hiring
Loc. Gov’t Ins. Tr. 2-4 (July 27, 2017), https://www.lgit.org/DocumentCenter/View/1931/Litigation-Roadmap https://perma.cc/24YE-HQ7L (outlining the
supra note 2, at 285. 10. See, e.g., THOMAS E. RICKS, THE GAMBLE: GENERAL PETRAEUS AND THE AMERICAN MILITARY ADVENTURE IN IRAQ 59-72 (2d ed. 2010
28 F.2d 666, 669 (9th Cir. 1928) (emphasis added). 27. See, e.g., IND. CODE ANN. § 35-41-2-4 (LexisNexis 2008); WYO. STAT. ANN. § 6-1-201(a) (2013
Original Meaning of the Commerce Clause, 13 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 1, 25 n.90 (2004). 30. E.g., Act of July 4, 1789, ch. 2, § 5, 1 Stat. 24, 27
Responses to Violent Crises Always Be Constitutional?, 112 YALE L.J. 1011, 1034, 1070-71 (2003). 24. See Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 2 (1866). 25