Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
the “fundamental rights” of territorial inhabitants.25 17. Id. art. IV, § 3, cl. 2. 18. AKHIL REED AMAR, AMERICA’S CONSTITUTION: A BIOGRAPHY 264
of Tiburon, 447 U.S. 255, 260 (1980) (citing Penn Cent. Transp. Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978)). the yale law journal 120:9 67 2 011
& Weyl, supra note 10, at 260. 13. Sunstein, supra note 2. the yale law journal forum January 22, 2015 308 half of the equation, breakeven
%20on%20PSG.pdf. 2 See Matter of C-A-, 3 I. & N. Dec. 951 (BIA 2006) (particular social group must be “visible”) and Matter of S-E- G-, 24 I. & N. Dec
at http://cgrs.uchastings.edu/pdfs/Redacted%20DHS%20brief%20on%20PSG.pdf. 2 See Matter of C-A-, 3 I. & N. Dec. 951 (BIA 2006) (particular social
21.06, Penal Code.”); see also Ala. Code § 16-40A-2(c)(8) (2014); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 15-716(c) (2014); La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 17:281(A)(1)(b)(3) (2014
generally 2 Wayne R. LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law § 10.1 (Supp. 2013-2014) (discussing the doctrine of necessity). See District of Columbia v
perma.cc/XYZ]. 4 Yasmin Nair, In Defense of Sluts, JEZEBEL (Mar. 8, 2012, 2:20 PM), https://jezebel.com/5891313/in-defense-of-sluts [https
https://www.scotusblog.com/2012/03/monday-round-up-108 [https://perma.cc/XYZ]. 2 Fed. R.R. Admin., Railroad Safety, U.S. DEP’T TRANSP., 27
2) concerning discriminatory intent on the part of a state actor. The 2016 election highlighted deep-seated problems in American democracy that