Search results for: "40" (2368 results)
class of articles manufactured or produced in such foreign country for such period as may be provided by such Executive order.”); Procurement Act, 40
397, 409-40 (2015) (recounting debates around the limits of the spending power from this period). Thomas Jefferson, for example, justified the 1803
329, § 402, 63 Stat. 714, 717 (repealed 1954). 42. Pub. L. No. 83-665, §§ 141, 142, 68 Stat. 832, 839-40 (repealed 1961). 43. Pub. L. No. 87-195
necessarily encompass policy disagreements. See Charles L. Black, Jr.,Some Thoughts on the Veto, 40 Law & Contemp. Probs. 87, 89-92 (1976). Over time, the
ECONOMIC AND LEGAL ANALYSIS (1959); Joe S. Bain, Worka- ble Competition in Oligopoly: Theoretical Considerations and Some Empirical Evidence, 40 AM
RONALD E. SEAVOY, THE ORIGINS OF THE AMERICAN BUSINESS CORPORATION, 1784-1855, at 39-40 (1982); TAYLOR, supra note 25, at 25 (“From 1815 to 1830
www.georgesonshareholder.com/pdf/M&Apoisonpill.pdf. 81. See Coates, supra note 15, at 277. 58.9% 51.4% 37.3% 52.7% 29.5% 35.5% 40.9% 31.3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40
be provided by such Executive order.”); Procurement Act, 40 U.S.C. § 121 (2012) (“The President may prescribe policies and directives that the
not enacted with discrim- inatory intent). the yale law journal 134:2848 2025 2862 reasons.40 It does not touch the crucial situations in which
broke from custom and engaged in a middecade redistricting, undoing the court-approved apportionment already in place.40 Although public attention