Search results for: "At" (3399 results)
Standing Committee, and the 156. See Mulligan & Staszewski, supra note 7, at 1194, 1202-05. 157. See id. at 1195-96 (describing how Bell Atlantic Corp
within the same case. At the same time, res judicata is the strongest finality principle on the menu: when it applies, the trial court lacks power to
Mendlow’s insightful essay, The Moral Ambiguity of Public Prosecution, properly puts victims back at the center of criminal justice. He is right that
attempt to 31. Laube v. Haley, 234 F. Supp. 2d 1227, 1252-53 (M.D. Ala. 2002) (finding unconstitutional con- ditions at Tutwiler Prison and granting
Atlanta, 778 F.2d 678, 685 (11th Cir. 1985); see also Anderson, 778 F.2d at 686 (“The jury could reasonably find that a policy of understaffing
central element of that inquiry is determining whether a defendant’s 1. 598 U.S. 508 (2023). 2. Id. at 516; see 17 U.S.C. § 107(1) (2018). The full
No. CV06-1079-A, 2013 WL 5592412, at *5 (W.D. La. Oct. 9, 2013) (citing Edwards v. Gilbert, 867 F.2d 1271 (11th Cir. 1989); Anderson v. Atlanta
atomistic individuals who interact only at the point of a discontinuous event, sharply limited in space and time. In the case of a tortious collision
fired by one department, some- times for serious misconduct, who then find work at another agency. Policing experts hold dispar- ate views about the