Search results for: "n" (3957 results)
note 50, at 142 n.16. 135. E.g., No Law But Our Own Prepossessions, 84 A.B.A.J. 482, 483 (1948); Com- ment, Church and State in American Education, 43
linked to both par- 162. See Della Corte v. Ramirez, 961 N.E.2d 601, 603 (Mass. App. Ct. 2012); see also NeJaime, supra note 16, at 1244 n.353
will not even begin, and the NDA is sent back to the manufacturer. 1 O’REILLY, supra note 46, § 13.11, at 13-67 n.379 (citing Letter from Roger L
601, 611-12 (N.C. Ct. App. 2000). The court assumed, without deciding, that the officer’s order was lawful. Id. at 611 n.3. 43. Id. at 610-12. 44
142 P.3d 62, 68 n.3 (Or. 2006) (distinguishing in dicta between “refusal”—which indicates that noncompliance must be “knowing or intentional”—and
33. Doan v. Brigano, 237 F.3d 722, 740 n.2 (6th Cir. 2001) (Suhrheinrich, J., concurring). 34. E.g., Gordon v. State, No. CR 99-482, 2001 Ark
95. See, e.g., Sun-Brite Car Wash, Inc. v. Bd. of Zoning & Appeals, 508 N.E.2d 130, 134 (N.Y. 1987) (“[A]n allegation of close proximity alone may
upholding the zoning commission’s decision), with T & N Assocs. v. New Milford Planning & Zoning Comm’n, No. CV 980492236S, 1999 WL 1077588, at *5 (Conn
Minneapolis, 488 N.W.2d 817, 819 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). 9. Dunton, 729 F.2d at 907; Van Ooteghem v. Gray, 628 F.2d 488, 495 n.7 (5th Cir. 1980
rights and liberties. 12 His new book, 51 Imperfect Solutions: 5. Id. at 368 n.5 (citation omitted). The Court noted that “[a] number of these [state