Search results for: "n" (3961 results)
courts 4th Cir.; D. Md.; E.D.N.C.; D.N.H. S.D. Tex. ca st d ou bt o n re tr oa ct iv it y/ ex te ns io n bu t di d no t r es ol ve state
Air Act 0 n/a Clean Water Act 3 Kerns v. Dukes, 707 A.2d 363 (Del. 1998); Berens v. Cook, 694 N.Y.S.2d 684 (App. Div. 1999); Puget Soundkeepers
being.” ). 7. Kaplow & Shavell, Conflict, supra note 2, at 66 n.5. 8. KAPLOW & SHAVELL, NON-INDIVIDUALISTIC, supra note 2, at 1. 9. A welfarist theory
expectancy of less than 5 years”). Compare Bagenstos, supra note 5, at 9 n.30 (arguing that we should not use “quantity-of-life measures such as the number of
democracy. Despite the common use of the term, it eludes common definition. When we agonize over the fake news phenomenon, though, we are not talk
Chase: Securitization, Foreclosure, and the Uncertainty of Mortgage Title, 63 DUKE L.J. 637, 642 n.18 (2013). See, e.g., In re Foreclosure Cases, No
Bugby, 967 S.W.2d 66, 72 (Mo. 1998); Trosper v. Bag ‘N Save, 734 N.W.2d 704, 707 (Neb. 2007); Chavez v. Sievers, 43 P.3d 1022, 1022 (Nev. 2002
statutory or decisional law in New York State”); see also Newmark v. Williams, 588 A.2d 1108, 1116 n.9 (Del. 1991) (the mature minor doctrine was not
accompanying notes 207-208. 279. See, e.g., Marta v. Sullivan, 248 A.2d 608, 610 & n.3 (Del. 1968) (invalidating a local ordi- nance “purport[ing] to
note 1, at 141-42, 220 n.5 (describing Justice Blackmun’s oral argument questioning, notes, and visit to the symphony two nights before the oral argu