Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
Legal Effectiveness of a Presidential Directive, as Com- pared to an Exec. Order, 24 Op. O.L.C. 29, 29 (2000) (“[T]here is no substantive difference
]rison discipline is an exercise of executive power.” (quoting State ex rel. Bray v. Russell, 729 N.E.2d 359, 362 (Ohio 2000))). 26. See, e.g., Tiffany
Discrimination by Health Insurers: The Impact of Legal Protections, 2 GENETICS MED. 214, 216 tbl.1 (2000) (showing that sixty- seven percent of genetic
Cir. 2019), vacated, No. 20-5649, 2021 WL 78043 (U.S. Jan. 11, 2021) (mem.). 291. 531 U.S. 12, 15 (2000). 292. Id. at 24. 293. 140 S. Ct. 1565, 1573
context of other antidiscrimination statutes, see Rosa v. Park West Bank & Trust Co., 214 F.3d 213, 214 (1st Cir. 2000), which considers a sex-discrim
]rison discipline is an exercise of executive power.” (quoting State ex rel. Bray v. Russell, 729 N.E.2d 359, 362 (Ohio 2000))). 26. See, e.g
challenge to the Food and Drug Administration’s 2000 approval of mifepristone, the first drug in the two-drug medication abortion protocol, a federal
2000, the suggestion by the State Bar of California’s Board of Trustees for innovations in legal services in 2019, and the recommendations of a
289 n.42 (2000). The Boldt Decision refers United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974). The Voigt Decision was Lac Courte Oreilles
151, 161-62 (D.D.C. 2000) (footnotes omitted). the yale law journal forum January 17, 2025 318 We don’t know what either of the tests would suggest